A passion, technology.
Imagine a working environment which promotes technological innovation and curiosity.
Imagine a group where you will have opportunity to work and to share with people among the most gifted.
Imagine a culture and stocks in break with SSII.
Imagine a society where your talents and your ideas will be admitted and encouraged.
Imagine an organisation which gives you the medium reals to work, to advance, to accomplish your personal plans.
Do not imagine any more, live him!
Do not hesitate to contact us across the Form of contact or directly at address recrutement@xebia.fr.
ADDM Adobe Android annotation GAPED development Devoxx Eclipse ESB WORKING FLASH FLEX GOOGLE GROOVY GWT HIBERNATE IBM J2EE POPULAR DANCE JAVAFX JAZOON JBOSS jdk-7 scala SCRUM SOA JEE JPA JSF JVM agile Methods MAVEN ORACLE OSGI PARIS JUG PERFORMANCE RIA SPRING SPRINGSOURCE SUN TOMCAT WEBSPHERE WICKET XEBIA XP
Xebia is a brain tumour, exclusively devoted to technologies J2EE.
Except opposite mention, the contents of this blog are under contract Creative Commons.
Guice (pronounce Juice) is the framework of injection of dependency of GOOGLE. The shape of dependency is made by code, with the aid of annotations, and requires therefore the use of Popular dance 5.
GOOGLE works currently on V2 of his framework, who hesitates to go out. However, a regular update of the Wiki of plan and publication snapshots already allow to make a good idea of this alternative in the injection of dependency 'to Spring'.
We start a series of articles today which is aimed at making you touch of the finger the big freedom which gives the injection of dependency by code. We will go progressively of basic concepts of Guice 2.0, towards an advanced use of the framework.
Let us take the postulate of following departure: the class MYSERVICEIMPL (which implements interface MYSERVICE) must accept the injection of the class MYBASICDAOIMPL (which implements interface MYBASICDAO).
In the source code of the class to be injected, we are therefore going to point out that Guice must take care of this injection, by using the annotation com.google.inject. Inject. In this first example, we will position this annotation at the level of the constructor.
Besides, we declare Appendable who will allow us to accomplish traces. This Appendable will be directly injected into variable.
You will point out that thanks to injection by constructor, we are capable of declaring BASICDAO final variable.
Injection can be accomplished at the level of the constructor, of a method even of very variable. Some advantages / disadvantages of these different methods:
Method recommended by GOOGLE is injection by constructor.
It is necessary us to link interface MYBASICDAO now to the realisation which we want to use at first, to know MYBASICDAOIMPL.
This is made in a module of spreading com.google.inject shape. Module with the aid of relatively explicit DSL.
Module allows to link interfaces to classes which Guice will undertake to instancier (_bind to _) but also in classes already instanci es (_bind toInstance _) as it is the case for our Appendable, that will be linked to the console System.
Last stage, it is necessary us to get an authority injected by our service.
It is to the class com.google.inject. Injector that we will recover her. This injector is created in a static way, from one or several Module.
In this example, we will accomplish this operation from one hand.
The question which settles as soon as they approach that the injection of dependency is really sure 'Yes, but in comparison with Spring?'.
Let us try to avoid the answer of Norman, even if Spring and Guice do not play in the same court: Guice concentrates exclusively on the injection of dependency, while Spring aims at giving a complete stack.
The team of Guice answers besides itself question on its wiki.
However, to give a more pragmatic point of view:
Following this series of articles, we will try to show that the difference of approach between Guice and Spring gives more freedom to the developers (but driven perhaps also to more chaos).
It is already the purpose of this tutoriel first, and you can inject a class now simply. However, in plan such as writes today, the class MYBASICDAOIMPL will be injected into all classes requiring MYBASICDAO. In a next article, we will see how raising this border.
Download Eclipse plan on the Google Code de Xebia
Official Site
A comparative of performances Spring / Guice, based on the previous versions
Tickets on the same topic:
You can follow answers accepted by this article thanks to the thread of comments.
Exactly in the same type, they have of course tapestry-ioc (http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-ioc/) who besides draws inspiration from it apparently.
Yes, we plan besides to make an article of presentation of tapestry-ioc method in next days.
For recall it is about a fork of .
To note that one of T5-IoC's big contributions in comparison with Guice is the possibility of configurer his services in a decentralised way, that is that different modules, in different ganders, can "participate" in the shape of a service defined in a module. For more information on this small wonder of modularit (without intending that coupled with the automatic load of modules T5-IoC located in the classpath, create a system of plugins for your application becomes free):
As for Hivemind, T5-IoC not is not a fork, in sense where there is no base of code common between both plans. But since in both cases, the creator is Howard Lewis Ship, there are big resemblances willy-nilly - one can as Tapestry 5 a fork of TAPESTRY 4 is not, but they have similarities apparently.
Defence Colis e - 10/12, avenue of The Ark
92419 Courbevoie Cedex
T l : +33 (0) 1 46 91 76 16
Fax : +33 (0) 1 46 91 88 00
E-mail : info@xebia.fr